<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Stock Blog Hub &#187; Under Armour</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stockbloghub.com/tag/under-armour/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stockbloghub.com</link>
	<description>Start Your Investing Research Here!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 23:16:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>(MFB) Institute for Supply Management Shows U.S. Manufacturing Increasing</title>
		<link>http://www.stockbloghub.com/2010/05/03/mfb-institute-for-supply-management-shows-u-s-manufacturing-increasing/35912</link>
		<comments>http://www.stockbloghub.com/2010/05/03/mfb-institute-for-supply-management-shows-u-s-manufacturing-increasing/35912#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 21:37:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>vitalstocks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer Goods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Textile - Apparel Clothing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maidenform Brands Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MFB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PCL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plum Creek Timber Company Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rayonier Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RYN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Under Armour]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stockbloghub.com/?p=35912</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Institute for Supply Management’s (ISM) manufacturing survey rose to a reading of 60.4 from 59.6 in February, an increase of 0.8 points and above the 60.0 reading that was expected. Any reading over 50 indicates that the manufacturing economy is expanding, so this is a very strong reading, indicating that the manufacturing economy is not only expanding but doing so at an accelerating rate relative to March. And it is at the highest level so far in this economic cycle. It is the highest reading since June of 2004, and is the fifth highest overall reading since the start of 1988! It is also a huge improvement over the rates we were seeing a year ago. The ISM is a good coincident indicator of the economy, plunging during recessions ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stockbloghub.com/2010/05/03/mfb-institute-for-supply-management-shows-u-s-manufacturing-increasing/35912/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>(UA) Under ArmourGets Penalized by Analysts</title>
		<link>http://www.stockbloghub.com/2009/01/22/ua-under-armourgets-penalized-by-analysts/2187</link>
		<comments>http://www.stockbloghub.com/2009/01/22/ua-under-armourgets-penalized-by-analysts/2187#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 19:40:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>InvestmentU</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer Goods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Textile - Apparel Clothing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CROCS Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CROX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nike Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NKE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Under Armour]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stockbloghub.com/?p=2187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Under Armour (UA) Gets Penalized by Analysts Yesterday, Under Armour (NYSE: UA) fell 16%. It’s dropped almost 30% over the past month. Today’s price of $18.25 getting close to the 52-week low of $16.05 it reached in November. And to add insult to (sports?) injury, original investors in the athletic wear company will note it’s well below what they paid in the 2005 IPO. But while many analysts suggest this company may be a one trick pony – akin to Crocs, (Nasdaq: CROX). They couldn’t be more wrong. The reason its share price was penalized was that analysts were expecting $1.09 instead of the .79 reported. This is a classic case of overreaction from a negative earnings report. The fact of the matter is that this brand has developed a ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stockbloghub.com/2009/01/22/ua-under-armourgets-penalized-by-analysts/2187/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

