(AIG) American International Group Denied Intervening in Bank of America Deal

On Tuesday, as reported by Reuters, American International Group Inc.‘s (AIG) attempts to intervene in Bank of America Corporation‘s (BAC) $8.5 billion mortgage bond settlement case were spurned. New York state Supreme Court Justice Barbara Kapnick not only dismissed the allegations of AIG, but also of the other investors.

Reasons Behind AIG’s Opposition

Along with a group of investors, AIG had earlier opposed BofA’s deal, citing the settlement as substantially inadequate. They wanted the settlement deal to come under Article 77, a special proceeding under which the scope of inquiry would amplify in the form of plenary action.

According to AIG, conversion of the settlement case into limited proceeding will provide the investors with a chance to scrutinize and consider whether the compensation offered to them by BofA was sufficient and without any involvement of its personal gains.

AIG claimed that The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (BK), Countrywide’s mortgage-backed securities (MBS) trustee, and several institutional investors manipulated the deal in such a way that the investors could not make out if the settlement was in their favor.

However, it appeared that AIG’s intention to interfere in the settlement deal was hugely influenced by its separate individual court case against BofA. This lawsuit was filed to recover a $10 billion loss on mortgage investments, which according to AIG occurred due to misrepresentation by BofA.

Objections in the Past

In March 2012, a similar lawsuit filed against BofA by a group of investors, led by Walnut Place group, was also dismissed. The litigation had charged BofA’s Countrywide Financial Corp. unit, which the bank acquired in 2008, of making wrong representations and warranties about the loans that backed these securities.

Earlier in this month, New York’s Attorney General (AG) Eric Schneiderman opposed the deal. According to the AG, the compensation that BofA is giving to the investors is inadequate compared to the losses incurred. The objection to the mortgage settlement deal comes after the case was transferred from the federal to the state court in late February.

Earlier, in August 2011, the New York AG had raised an objection against the deal and won the approval of the federal court judge to intervene and take part in the case. But, with the settlement deal again transferred to the state court, he has to file for the permission to participate in the case again.

The Story Behind

In June 2011, BofA had entered into an agreement to pay $8.5 billion for its legacy Countrywide mortgage repurchase and servicing claims. This deal was struck between BofA, BNY Mellon, Pacific Investment Management Co., MetLife Inc. (MET), BlackRock Inc. (BLK) and a group of about 20 investors who suffered huge losses for their investments in MBS that were sold by Countrywide prior to the housing market failure.

The agreement basically covered most of BofA’s legacy Countrywide- issued first-lien MBS repurchase exposure. It represented 530 trusts with original principal balance of $424 billion and total current unpaid principal balance of about $221 billion.

Conclusion

The dismissal of the lawsuits filed by AIG and Walnut Place, the two key complainers of the settlement deal, will provide the much needed conviction to BofA’s efforts to successfully close the settlement deal.

On the other hand, the acquisition of Countrywide resulted in elevated mortgage exposure for BofA, compared with its peers. Following the collapse of the housing market, mortgage repurchases claim risk for the company grew manifold. This has significantly drained the company’s bottom line over the last several quarters.

Moreover, with the new objections raised by the New York AG, there might be a delay in getting the approval. However, if the AG participates in the settlement deal, the investors will have a chance to get a better deal from BofA.

Currently, the shares of BofA have a Zacks #3 Rank, which translates into a short-term Hold rating. Additionally, we maintain our long-term Neutral recommendation on the stock.

AMER INTL GRP (AIG): Free Stock Analysis Report

BANK OF AMER CP (BAC): Free Stock Analysis Report

BANK OF NY MELL (BK): Free Stock Analysis Report

BLACKROCK INC (BLK): Free Stock Analysis Report

METLIFE INC (MET): Free Stock Analysis Report

To read this article on Zacks.com click here.

About vitalstocks

This is a sample profile field. Vitalstocks is the operating company for Stockbloghub. This will place the picture of the author or company in the profile. Here is another extra line of information.

Comments

Powered by Facebook Comments


Similar Posts: | | | | | | | | | | Financial | Property & Casualty Insurance

RSS feeds: AIG | American International Group Inc | BAC | Bank of America Corporation | BK | BlackRock Inc. | BLK | MET | MetLife Inc. | The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation | Financial | Property & Casualty Insurance |

Other Posts by | RSS Feed for this author